The objective of the Liquids Aerosols and Gels (LAGS) Trials is to assess the capability of various screening technologies to detect explosives in LAGs, with the ultimate objective of providing information to the Australian Government on the effectiveness and efficiency of the screening technology (in aviation security). The proposed public awareness strategy aims to raise awareness of the Trials amongst the travelling public, encourage their participation, and inform them of their rights and obligations during the Trials.

Independent Report on the 2008 Liquids, Aerosols and Gels Technology Trials Advertising Campaign

To the Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government

Introduction

The Government Guidelines on Campaign Advertising by Australian Government Departments and Agencies (the Guidelines) state that Government information and advertising campaigns can only be approved for launching by the Minister where:

  • the Chief Executive of the agency undertaking the campaign certifies that the campaign complies with the Guidelines and relevant Government policies; and
  • for those campaigns with expenditure in excess of $250 000, the Auditor-General provides a report to the Minister responsible for the agency undertaking the campaign as to the proposed campaign’s compliance with the Guidelines.

Scope

I have undertaken a review of the 2008 Liquids, Aerosols and Gels (LAGs) Technology Trials Advertising Campaign, administered by the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government to enable me to report on the proposed advertising campaign’s compliance with the Guidelines.

The Guidelines state that advertising campaigns should be instigated only where a need is demonstrated, target recipients are clearly identified and the advertising campaign is based on appropriate research, and require that:

  • material should be relevant to government responsibilities;
  • material should be presented in an objective, fair and accessible manner;
  • material should not be directed at promoting party political interests;
  • material should be produced and distributed in an efficient, effective and relevant manner, with due regard to accountability; and
  • advertising must comply with legal requirements.

The criteria I have used to make my assessment of the 2008 LAGs Technology Trials Advertising Campaign’s compliance with the Guidelines are the matters specified at paragraphs 11 to 24 of the Guidelines on Campaign Advertising by Australian Government Department and Agencies published by the Department of Finance and Deregulation in June 2008.

As of the date of this report, the final video news release for the advertising campaign has not been produced. As such these materials are outside the scope of this review. The Department has undertaken to provide these materials to me separately for review against the Guidelines before they are publicly released.

Responsibilities of the Department

Agencies subject to the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 must comply with the Guidelines as a matter of Government policy. The Secretary of the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government has certified that the advertising campaign complies with the Guidelines.

The Auditor’s Responsibility

My responsibility is to express, in this assurance report, an independent conclusion based on my review.

My review is conducted in accordance with the Australian Standard on Assurance Engagements ASAE 3000 Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information issued by the Australian Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. My review is designed to enable me to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to form a conclusion whether anything has come to my attention to indicate that the advertising campaign does not comply, in all material respects, with the Guidelines.

Review methodology

I have conducted the review of the advertising campaign by making such enquiries and performing such procedures as I considered reasonable in the circumstances including:

  • an examination of advertising campaign materials including television and cinema commercials, magazine and outdoor presentations, and web banners;
  • a review of supporting documents and records relevant to the advertising campaign, including related research and advertising campaign funding approvals;
  • interviews with staff of the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government involved with the preparation of the advertising campaign;
  • an assessment of the reasonableness of the judgements made by the Department against each of the Guidelines; and
  • an examination of the certification by the Secretary of Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government dated 23 September 2008.

The ANAO review did not extend to an assessment of the general system controls and supporting procedures in place in the Department to manage its advertising activities, but focussed on matters relating specifically to the 2008 LAGs Technology Trials Advertising Campaign. A review of this nature provides less assurance than an audit.

Conclusion

Based on my review described in this report, nothing has come to my attention that causes me to believe that the 2008 LAGs Technology Trials Advertising Campaign does not comply, in all material respects, with the requirements of the Government’s Guidelines on Campaign Advertising by Australian Government Departments and Agencies.

Ian McPhee
Auditor-General
Canberra, 29 September 2008