Browse our range of reports and publications including performance and financial statement audit reports, assurance review reports, information reports and annual reports.
Government spending on external contractors and consultants
Please direct enquiries relating to requests for audit through our contact page.
The Auditor-General responded on 22 November 2019 to correspondence from Senator Katy Gallagher dated 25 October 2019, requesting that the Auditor-General conduct an investigation to examine government spending on external contractors and consultants.
Auditor-General's response
22 November 2019
Senator Katy Gallagher
Shadow Minister for Finance
Shadow Minister for the Public Service
Manager of Opposition Business in the Senate
Senator for the Australian Capital Territory
By email: senator.katy.gallagher@aph.gov.au
Dear Senator Gallagher
I am writing in response to your letter of 25 October 2019 requesting I further examine government spending on external contractors and consultants, specifically raising three areas of concern, each of which are addressed below.
- Whether agencies are currently reporting the value of consultancy and contractor contracts correctly and transparently and in line with the intent of PGPA Rule 17AG
The PGPA Act Rule 17AG only requires annual consultancy expenditure to be reported. This information, which is contained in annual reports is not subject to audit. Some entities’ financial statements include a category within supplier expenses for ‘contractors and consultants’. Where this item is included, the Australian National Audit Office’s (ANAO) annual audit of entities financial statements will consider whether the amount allocated to this category is materially correct. To undertake a separate audit on all agencies would be cost prohibitive for the ANAO. The ANAO last examined consultancy expenditure in January 2006, when 73 government entities were examined, with a number of recommendations made for improving the accuracy of consultancy reporting in annual reports. It should be noted that PGPA Rule 17AG only applies to non-corporate Commonwealth entities.
- The Department of Finance’s approach to defining a consultancy contract and its impact on the way agencies disclose their spending on consultancy services in annual report
The ANAO conducted an audit on ‘Engagement of Consultancies’ in June 2001. This audit included a recommendation to the Department of Finance to develop ‘a clearer definition of contracts for services (consultancies) and contracts of service (contractors)’. Finance implemented this recommendation and has maintained that definition of consultancies since. The definition has been incorporated into annual reporting guidance.
Further, the independent review of the PGPA Act recommended that:
The definition of ‘consultancy’ should be clarified to ensure that spending on consultancies is reported consistently and accurately by non-corporate Commonwealth entities in their annual reports and other places where consultancy spending is reported. Non-corporate Commonwealth entities should provide the following information on expenditure on contracts and consultancies in their annual reports:
- total aggregate expenditure on contracts and consultancies and the number of new and ongoing contracts in the reporting period (extending the current reporting requirements for consultancies to contracts in general); and
- details of all organisations and/or individuals that receive five per cent or more of the entity’s total expenditure on contracts and consultancies, respectively. Where this includes fewer than five organisations/individuals, the five that receive the greatest level of expenditure across all of their contracts with the entity, should be disclosed.
The Department of Finance has advised the ANAO that it is in the process of developing a comprehensive Resource Management Guide on procurement publishing and reporting obligations. The Department’s intention is that the guide will assist procuring officials to understand their obligations for procurement and contract reporting, including consultancy reporting, and will summarise the various reporting obligations in the Commonwealth Procurement Rules and other government policies into one document.
- The usability of Austender as a reliable platform capable of providing usable data about spending on external contractors and consultants
As you are aware, the ANAO produced an information report for the Parliament in December 2017 that provided insights into Austender reporting, including commentary on potential errors in the data. The report was not an audit and did not make recommendations for improvement. An update to this report is underway and planned to be finalised in February 2020. Austender is a system designed to bring transparency and industry awareness to non-corporate Commonwealth tender processes. There is also an obligation under free trade agreements to report on contract values, and Austender is also used for this purpose. The system is not designed or intended to report on actual expenditure under contracts, so cannot be used to reconcile consultancy contracts issued with expenditure reported in annual reports.
Given the above activity already underway in the area of consultancy reporting, the ANAO has no current plans to undertake a further audit on consultancy spending and reporting, but I will consider sector wide risks in this area of reporting in developing the 2020–21 annual audit work program.
Yours sincerely
Grant Hehir
Auditor-General
Correspondence from Senator Katy Gallagher
.
Transcript of letter from Senator Katy Gallagher
Mr Grant Hehir
Auditor-General
Australian National Audit Office
GPO Box 707
Canberra ACT 2601
25 October 2019
Dear Mr Hehir
Government spending on external contractors and consultants
The Australian Government is spending billions of dollars of tax payers' money every year on external contractors and consultants with very little transparency or accountability over how much is being spent each year and why.
As I have just explored at Supplementary Budget Estimates, the current system of reporting expenditure on external contractors and consultants across the Australian Public Service (APS) is opaque, unreliable and almost impossible to track.
Work already done by the ANAO and the Joint Committee on Public Accounts and Audit (JCPAA) uncovered two major issues with the reporting of this type of expenditure:
- Failure to provide transparency in annual reports on consulting spend
The clear intention of PGPA Rule 17AG is that agencies disclose their spending on consulting services in annual reports.
Although this is intended to provide transparent reporting on the use of consulting services, the current definition for a "consultancy" provided by the Department of Finance appears to exclude significant amounts of work performed by consulting firms under contract to various APS departments and agencies.
Last Friday, the Australian Financial Review (AFR) uncovered that the Department of Defence appears to have spent $1.5 billion on contracts which were categorised as some form of consulting service, but not classified as a consultancy for the purposes of PGPA Rule 17AG. - The inconsistent and unreliable nature of Austender as a reporting platform
While Austender provides some transparency in relation to individual contracts, the current configuration of Austender makes it incredibly difficult to get a clear picture of spending patterns at an agency or whole of government level in any given year or indeed over the longer term.
In light of these continuing issues, I ask that you consider a further examination of these issues including:
- whether agencies are currently reporting the value of consultancy and contractors contracts correctly and transparently and in line with the intent of the PGPA Rule 17AG;
- the Department of Finance's approach to defining a consultancy contract and its impact on the way agencies disclose their spending on consulting services in annual reports;
- the usability of Austender as a reliable platform capable of providing usable data about spending on external contractors and consultants;
For your convenience I have attached a copy of the article published by the Australian Financial Review on the 25th October this year.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require further information regarding this matter.
Yours sincerely,
Senator Katy Gallagher
Shadow Minister for Finance and the Public Service
Senator for the ACT