Browse our range of reports and publications including performance and financial statement audit reports, assurance review reports, information reports and annual reports.
Portfolio overview
The Finance portfolio is responsible for a range of finance-related functions, including providing the Australian Government with budget policy advice, superannuation arrangements for government employees, deregulation policy, data and digital policy and services, insurance and risk management services, ministerial and parliamentary services and Australian Government asset management services.
The Department of Finance is the lead entity in the portfolio and is responsible for supporting the government’s budget process and the development and implementation of the government’s regulatory frameworks for public sector resource management, governance and accountability. The department is also responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements of the Australian Government, which includes the whole-of-government and the general government sector financial statements and the Australian Government’s financial outcome. The department provides shared services through the Service Delivery Office. Further information is available from the department’s website.
In addition to the Department of Finance, there are eight entities (excluding subsidiaries) within the portfolio that are responsible for: electoral administration; digital transformation; supporting retirement and insurance benefits for members of Commonwealth superannuation schemes; managing the investment activities of the Future Fund and other funds; auditing and reporting of parliamentarians’ work expenses; supporting people affected by serious incidents or misconduct in the parliamentary workplace; and supporting Australia’s naval defence capability.
In the 2024–25 Portfolio Budget Statements (PBS) for the Finance portfolio, the aggregated budgeted expenses for 2024–25 total $14.7 billion. The PBS contain budgets for those entities in the general government sector (GGS) that receive appropriations directly or indirectly through annual appropriation Acts.
The level of budgeted departmental
and administered expenses, and the average staffing level for entities in the GGS within this portfolio are shown in Figure 1. The Department of Finance represents the largest proportion of the portfolio’s expenses, and administered expenses of the portfolio are the most material component, representing 85 per cent of the entire portfolio’s expenses.Source: ANAO analysis of 2024–25 Portfolio Budget Statements.
Audit focus
In determining the 2024–25 annual audit work program (AAWP), the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) considers prior-year audit and other review findings and what these indicate about portfolio risks and areas for improvement. The ANAO also considers emerging risks from new investments or changes in the operating environment.
The primary risks identified for the portfolio relate to stewardship of whole-of-government frameworks to achieve intended outcomes. In particular this relates to the effective administration of the finance law in the context of devolved arrangements, particularly the stewardship of policy frameworks intended to promote the efficient, effective, economical and ethical use of public resources by entities. The delivery of the National Security Office precinct is also a risk for the portfolio.
Specific risks in the Finance portfolio relate to governance, service delivery, policy development, and financial management.
Governance
Development of the sustainability reporting framework and assurance regime in Australia is progressing. The Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Bill 2024 will require climate related disclosures for certain entities established under the Corporations Act 2001. ASC Pty Ltd would be required to report under these arrangements at 30 June 2026 on areas such as climate risks and opportunities, governance arrangements and emissions. The climate disclosures for these entities will be subject to assurance. Entities should review their preparedness to meet these requirements in order to support accurate and timely reporting and audit.
Service delivery
Entities in the Finance portfolio are responsible for the delivery of effective public sector services, including electoral services and ministerial and parliamentary services. Ongoing considerations for effective service delivery include establishing appropriate governance arrangements, addressing risks, providing accurate and consistent advice, implementing processes in accordance with applicable procedures, and establishing fit-for-purpose assurance and evaluation frameworks
.Finance is responsible for the delivery of major non-defence property for Commonwealth agencies. This includes the administration of procurement for the construction and development of the National Security Office precinct at York Park in Barton, ACT. The precinct is expected to accommodate up to 5,000 workers.
Recent audit activity has identified that when designing and implementing systems, entities should have a clear and robust understanding of user requirements and agreed scope to inform budget, timeframes, delivery approach and risk
.Policy development
As a central agency, the Department of Finance contributes to the review, development and implementation of Australian Government policies, including the delivery of the APS Net Zero Emissions by 2030 and the data and Digital Government Strategy. Previous audit activity has identified the importance of ensuring that policy development and advice is supported by appropriate evidence and analysis, whole-of-government co-ordination, and considers the views of stakeholders
Entities in the Finance portfolio are the policy owners and stewards of whole-of-government frameworks, including the finance law and frameworks for procurement, grants administration, government advertising, risk management and digital policy. These frameworks are intended to: regulate the governance, performance and accountability of Commonwealth entities; and promote the efficient, effective, economical and ethical use of public resources by the Commonwealth and Commonwealth entities.
Audit work has identified risks to the effectiveness of frameworks, which operate under a self-regulatory approach, where policy owners establish the rules of operation and then largely leave it to entity accountable authorities to be responsible for compliance
. There are no formal mechanisms in these frameworks to provide assurance on compliance and whether the framework is having the intended result. In these circumstances, some risks can be mitigated by the policy owner providing guidance, support and advice to entities, and the management of known framework risks and issues as they arise .Audit activity has also identified risks in achieving the intended outcomes of self-regulatory frameworks such as the procurement and grants frameworks. Specifically, where entities have sought to comply with the letter of the procurement or grants rules without considering how this achieves the intent of the rules. Audits of procurement have identified occasions where the implementation of procurement arrangements has fallen short of reasonable standards, including in respect to the assessment of value for money
, while audits of grants administration have identified risks relating to the promotion of open, transparent and equitable access to grants . Audits of grants and procurement have also identified shortcomings relating to the provision of advice to decision-makers, record-keeping, probity management, public reporting, and other framework requirements.As a framework policy owner, Finance regularly receives recommendations as part of parliamentary committee inquiries and external audit activity. Recent audit activity has identified that central agencies can contribute to improved public sector performance by modelling the adoption of better practice in their own execution of functions under the frameworks they administer, and in so doing promote better practice across the sector
.Financial management
Finance portfolio entities have a role in maximising financial outcomes for the Australian Government and the public and providing advice on financial management and appropriations. Effective decision-making, especially in relation to investments and the management of resources and assets, involves appropriate planning, calculation and analysis, execution, monitoring and evaluation
. New investments for the Australian Government include: acquisition of private entities and issuance of equity contributions and loans (e.g. Snowy Hydro Limited and Australian Naval Infrastructure).Avoiding the risk of non-compliance with the appropriations framework requires effective engagement between the Department of Finance and other entities
.Previous performance audit coverage
The ANAO’s performance audit activities involve the independent and objective assessment of all or part of an entity’s operations and administrative support systems. Performance audits may involve multiple entities and examine common aspects of administration or the joint administration of a program or service.
During the performance audit process, the ANAO gathers and analyses the evidence necessary to draw a conclusion on the audit objective. Audit conclusions can be grouped into four categories:
- unqualified;
- qualified (largely positive);
- qualified (partly positive); and
- adverse.
In the period between 2019–20 and 2023–24 entities within the Finance portfolio were included in tabled ANAO performance audits 19 times . The conclusions directed toward entities within this portfolio were as follows:
- two were unqualified;
- six were qualified (largely positive);
- six were qualified (partly positive); and
- five were adverse.
Figure 2 shows the number of audit conclusions for entities within the Finance portfolio that were included in ANAO performance audits between 2019–20 and 2023–24 compared with all audits tabled in this period.
Source: ANAO data.
The ANAO’s annual audit work program is intended to deliver a mix of performance audits across seven audit activities: governance; service delivery; grants administration; procurement; policy development; regulation and asset management and sustainment. These activities are intended to cover the scope of activities undertaken by the public sector. Each performance audit considers a primary audit activity. Figure 3 shows audit conclusions by primary audit activity for audits involving entities in the Finance portfolio.
Source: ANAO data.
Financial statements audits
Overview
Entities within the Finance portfolio, and the risk profile of each entity, are shown in Table 1.
|
Type of entity |
Engagement risk |
Number of higher risks |
Number of moderate risks |
Material entities |
||||
Department of Finance |
Non-corporate |
Moderate |
3 |
2 |
ASC Pty Ltd |
Company |
Moderate |
1 |
1 |
Australian Naval Infrastructure Pty Ltd |
Company |
Moderate |
1 |
1 |
Future Fund Management Agency |
Non-corporate |
Moderate |
1 |
1 |
Non-material entities |
||||
Australian Electoral Commission |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation (CSC) |
Corporate |
Moderate |
|
|
Digital Transformation Agency |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Independent Parliamentary Expenses Authority |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Parliamentary Workplace Support Service |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Other audit engagements (including Auditor-General Act 1997 section 20 engagements) |
||||
Administered Investment Funds |
||||
Advances to the Finance Minister |
||||
ASC Pty Ltd and its consolidated entities – half-year review |
||||
ASC Pty Ltd – agreed upon procedures – remuneration report |
||||
Australian Defence Force Superannuation Scheme |
||||
Australian Defence Force Superannuation Scheme– limited assurance report on Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) reporting forms and on controls and compliance |
||||
Australian Defence Force Superannuation Scheme– reasonable assurance report on APRA reporting forms and on compliance |
||||
Australian Reward Investment Alliance Alternative Assets Trust |
||||
Australian Reward Investment Alliance Co. Pty Ltd |
||||
Australian Reward Investment Alliance Investment Trust |
||||
Australian Reward Investment Alliance Investment Trust – limited assurance report APRA reporting forms and on controls and compliance |
||||
Australian Reward Investment Alliance Investment Trust – reasonable assurance report on APRA reporting forms and on compliance |
||||
Australian Reward Investment Alliance Property Fund |
||||
Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation – Australian financial services licence compliance and registrable superannuation entity licence compliance |
||||
Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation Treasury Trust |
||||
Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS) |
||||
Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme – limited assurance report on APRA reporting forms and on controls and compliance |
||||
Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme – reasonable assurance report on APRA reporting forms and on compliance |
||||
Future Fund Investment Company No. 1 Pty Ltd |
||||
Future Fund Investment Company No. 2 Pty Ltd |
||||
Future Fund Investment Company No. 3 Pty Ltd |
||||
Future Fund Investment Company No. 4 Pty Ltd |
||||
Future Fund Investment Company No. 5 Pty Ltd |
||||
Military Superannuation and Benefits Scheme |
||||
Military Superannuation and Benefits Scheme – limited assurance report on APRA reporting forms and on controls and compliance |
||||
Military Superannuation and Benefits Scheme – reasonable assurance report on APRA reporting forms and on compliance |
||||
MRFF Investment Company No. 1 Pty Ltd |
||||
MRFF Investment Company No. 2 Pty Ltd |
||||
Property Management Trust |
||||
Public Sector Superannuation Scheme (PSS) |
||||
Public Sector Superannuation Scheme – limited assurance report on APRA reporting forms and on controls and compliance |
||||
Public Sector Superannuation Scheme – reasonable assurance report on APRA reporting forms and on compliance |
||||
Public Sector Superannuation Scheme Accumulation Plan |
||||
Public Sector Superannuation Scheme Accumulation Plan – limited assurance report on APRA reporting forms and on controls and compliance |
||||
Public Sector Superannuation Scheme Accumulation Plan – reasonable assurance report on APRA reporting forms and on compliance |
||||
Public Sector Superannuation Scheme Investments Trust |
||||
Public Sector Superannuation Scheme Property Trust A |
||||
Public Sector Superannuation Scheme Property Trust B |
||||
Note a: Sourced from Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (Flipchart of PGPA Act) Commonwealth entities and companies (Department of Finance) as at 1 March 2024.
Material entities
Department of Finance
The Department of Finance is responsible for supporting the government’s budget process and oversight of public sector resource management, and for governance and accountability frameworks. In addition, the Department of Finance is responsible for the production of the Australian Government’s consolidated financial statements. The Department of Finance also provides shared services through the Service Delivery Office.
The Department of Finance’s total budgeted liabilities for 2024–25 are $168.5 billion, with superannuation liabilities representing 98 per cent, and outstanding insurance claims representing one per cent as shown in Figure 4. Investments represent 89 per cent of total budgeted assets, while employee benefits represent six per cent of total budgeted expenses.
Source: ANAO analysis of 2024–25 Portfolio Budget Statements.
There are five key risks for the Department of Finance’s 2023–24 financial statements that the ANAO has highlighted for specific audit coverage, including four risks that the ANAO considers potential key audit matters (KAMs).
- The complex assumptions and calculations underpinning the actuarial assessment of the public sector superannuation liability. (KAM – Valuation of superannuation provisions)
- The estimation of the outstanding claims liability for the Australian Government’s self-managed general insurance fund, due to the complex calculation of the liability that involves assumptions requiring significant judgement. (KAM – Valuation of, and accounting for, outstanding insurance claims)
- The valuation of the property portfolio, which consists of a large number of properties with unique characteristics. The process is complex and involves the use of different valuation methods that require significant judgement on the selection of assumptions within the valuation models. (KAM – Valuation of properties)
- The valuation of private market investments, due to the inherent subjectivity and significant judgements and estimates required where market data is not available to determine the fair value of these investments. (KAM – Valuation of private market investments)
- The accuracy of employee expenses and valuation of provisions relating to members of Parliament and their staff.
ASC Pty Ltd
ASC Pty Ltd (ASC) is a proprietary company limited by shares registered under the Corporations Act 2001. The Minister for Finance is the sole shareholder Minister on behalf of the Commonwealth of Australia.
ASC and its subsidiaries – including ASC AWD Shipbuilder Pty Ltd and ASC OPV
Shipbuilder Pty Ltd – support Australia’s naval capabilities. ASC was the builder of Australia’s fleet of Collins class submarines for the Royal Australian Navy. ASC is responsible for the ongoing design enhancement, maintenance, and support of Australia’s fleet of Collins class submarines.On 22 March 2024, the government announced ASC Pty Ltd had been selected for the sustainment of nuclear-powered submarines as well as ASC Pty Ltd and BAE Systems to build Australia’s SSN-AUKUS submarines though an incorporated joint venture arrangement within Australia.
As part of the incorporated joint venture, ASC Pty Ltd and BAE Systems will be accountable and responsible for the delivery of SSN-AUKUS submarines, as well as ensuring safety, security, and regulatory compliance throughout the build program.
ASC’s total actual revenue for 2022–23 was $767.8 million, with the majority attributable to revenue from contracts with customers, as shown in Figure 5.
Source: ANAO analysis of ASC Pty Ltd’s 2022–23 Annual Report.
There are two risks for the ASC Pty Ltd 2023–24 financial statements that the ANAO has highlighted for specific audit coverage.
- Revenue recognition for accounting of In-Service Support Contract (ISSC) is a high risk. This is primarily due to the magnitude of the revenue which is derived by a model which involves significant assumptions and data to estimate revenue.
- Revenue recognition for accounting for Sovereign Shipbuilding Talent Pool (SSTP) and Life of Type Extension (LoTE) programs is recognised as a moderate risk. This is primarily due to the magnitude of the program, complexity of judgements and estimates used in estimating revenue.
Australian Naval Infrastructure Pty Ltd
Australian Naval Infrastructure Pty Ltd (ANI) is responsible for supporting the Commonwealths’ continuous naval shipbuilding program by being the owner, developer and manager of infrastructure and related facilities.
The infrastructure held by ANI at Osborne in South Australia is used by Luerssen Australia Pty Ltd for the construction of two offshore patrol vessels, ASC Shipbuilding Pty Ltd for the Hunter Class Frigate program, and ASC Pty Ltd (ASC) for maintenance of the Collins class submarines under contract arrangements with the Commonwealth, represented by the Department of Defence.
ANI is a proprietary company limited by shares registered under the Corporations Act 2001. The Commonwealth, represented jointly by the Minister for Finance and Minister for Defence as Shareholder Ministers, wholly own all of ANI’s share capital.
ANI’s total assets for 2022–23 were $1.6 billion, with 94 per cent attributable to property, plant and equipment, as shown in Figure 6. Total revenue is just over $51.9 million, with 91 per cent attributable to lease income.
Source: ANAO analysis of the Australian Naval Infrastructure Pty Ltd’s 2022–23 Annual Report.
There are two key risks for ANI’s 2023–24 financial statements that the ANAO has highlighted for specific audit coverage.
- The recognition and valuation of property, plant and equipment due to the value and complexity of assets held by ANI. This includes judgements undertaken by ANI to assess asset remaining useful lives.
- The accounting for, and reporting of, ANI’s revenue from properties which includes a number of revenue streams, the volume and complexity of transactions, and the impact of the application of Australian accounting standard AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers on revenue recognition, measurement and disclosure.
Future Fund Management Agency
The Future Fund Board of Guardians, supported by the Future Fund Management Agency (together the Future Fund), is responsible for investing the assets of the Future Fund under the Future Fund Act 2006, and other investment funds, managed on behalf of the Department of Finance. The investment of the funds is managed under the Disability Care Australia Fund Act 2013; the Medical Research Future Fund Act 2015; the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land and Sea Future Fund Act 2018; the Future Drought Fund Act 2019; the Disaster Ready Fund Act 2019; and the Housing Australia Future Fund Act 2023 as a means to provide financing sources for substantial future investments in the Australian economy.
The Future Fund’s total budgeted assets for 2024–25 are $241.3 billion with 99 per cent of these assets attributable to other investments, as shown in Figure 7.
Source: ANAO analysis of 2024–25 Portfolio Budget Statements.
There are two key risks for the Future Fund 2023–24 financial statements that the ANAO has highlighted for specific audit coverage, including one risk that the ANAO considers to be a potential key audit matter (KAM).
- The valuation of private market investments, due to the inherent subjectivity and significant judgements and estimates required where market data is not available to determine the fair value of these investments. (KAM – Valuation of collective investment vehicles held at fair value through profit or loss)
- The valuation of public market investments undertaken by the custodian of the Future Fund, due to the size of the investments.