Browse our range of reports and publications including performance and financial statement audit reports, assurance review reports, information reports and annual reports.
Portfolio overview
The Attorney-General’s portfolio is responsible for: legal services; national security and criminal law; integrity and anti-corruption matters; the Commonwealth justice system including courts, tribunals, justice policy and legal assistance; regulation and reform; protecting and promoting human rights; and support for Commonwealth royal commissions.
The Attorney-General’s Department (AGD) is the lead entity in the portfolio and is responsible for Australia’s law and justice framework and providing legal services to the Commonwealth. Further information is available from the department’s website.
In addition to AGD and the High Court of Australia
, there are 16 portfolio entities that are responsible for delivering programs and initiatives in relation to law and justice. The portfolio’s material entities are AGD, the High Court of Australia and the Australian Federal Police.In the 2024–25 Portfolio Budget Statements (PBS) for the Attorney-General’s portfolio, the aggregated budgeted expenses for 2024–25 totalled $5.0 billion. The PBS contain budgets for those entities in the general government sector (GGS) that receive appropriations directly or indirectly through annual appropriation Acts.
The level of budgeted departmental
and administered expenses, and the average staffing level for entities in the GGS within this portfolio are shown in Figure 1. The Australian Federal Police represents the largest proportion of portfolio expenses, and departmental expenses of the portfolio are the most material component, representing 87 per cent of the entire portfolio’s expenses.Source: ANAO analysis of 2024–25 Portfolio Budget Statements.
Audit focus
In determining the 2024–25 audit work program, the ANAO considers prior-year audit and other review findings and what these indicate about portfolio risks and areas for improvement. The ANAO also considers emerging risks from new investments or changes in the operating environment.
The primary risks identified for the portfolio relate to supporting Australian Government entities to act lawfully in carrying out functions and the managing effectiveness and compliance risks for whole-of-government regulatory and policy frameworks such as lobbyists, fraud, freedom of information, privacy, anti-corruption and integrity.
Specific risks in the Attorney-General’s portfolio relate to grants administration, procurement, policy development and regulation.
Grants administration
The department’s grants administration responsibilities increased with the movement to it of various functions formerly within the Home Affairs portfolio, with $131 million in grants awarded to commence in 2022–23. Grant programs may be delivered through grant hub arrangements, an approach that does not diminish the department’s responsibility for program design and delivery including the standard of application assessments . It is also important that decision making on the award of grant funding be informed by appropriate advice .
Procurement
Across the portfolio, 3372 contracts valued at $2.1 billion were reported on AusTender to commence in 2022–23. Procurement and contract management activity is important in a number of areas related to portfolio responsibilities including the new Federal Register of Legislation project and procurements to implement some of the measures under the National Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse 2020–2031.
Policy development
AGD is playing policy development and implementation roles in areas that include: the implementation of a National Anti-Corruption Commission; the government’s response to the recommendations outlined by the Australian Human Rights Commission’s Respect@Work Report; implementing actions in response to the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse; and exploring opportunities to reform statutory appointment processes.
Regulation
AGD is responsible for: whole-of-government regulation under the Commonwealth Fraud and Corruption Control Framework; regulating certain business activities in the financial, bullion and gambling sectors that have been identified as posing a risk for money laundering and terrorism financing; privacy legislation
;and the lobbying code of conduct and register of lobbyists . The department is also responsible for assisting Australian Government entities to comply with the Legal Services Directions (through a Compliance Framework, guidance notes and education program) and supporting Australian Government entities to act lawfully in carrying out their functions.Previous performance audit coverage
The ANAO’s performance audit activities involve the independent and objective assessment of all or part of an entity’s operations and administrative support systems. Performance audits may involve multiple entities and examine common aspects of administration or the joint administration of a program or service.
During the performance audit process, the ANAO gathers and analyses the evidence necessary to draw a conclusion on the audit objective. Audit conclusions can be grouped into four categories:
- unqualified;
- qualified (largely positive);
- qualified (partly positive); and
- adverse.
In the period between 2019–20 to 2023–24 entities within the Attorney-General’s portfolio were included in tabled ANAO performance audits 15 times . The conclusions directed toward entities within this portfolio were as follows:
- none were unqualified;
- five were qualified (largely positive);
- nine were qualified (partly positive); and
- one was adverse.
Figure 2 shows the number of audit conclusions for entities within the Attorney-General’s portfolio that were included in ANAO performance audits between 2019–20 and 2023–24 compared with all audits tabled in this period.
Source: ANAO data.
The ANAO’s annual audit work program is intended to deliver a mix of performance audits across seven audit activities: governance; service delivery; grants administration; procurement; policy development; regulation and asset management and sustainment. These activities are intended to cover the scope of activities undertaken by the public sector. Each performance audit considers a primary audit activity. Figure 3 shows audit conclusions by primary audit activity for audits involving entities in the Attorney-General’s portfolio.
Source: ANAO data.
Performance statements audit
The audit of the 2023–24 Attorney-General’s Department’s (AGD) annual performance statements is being conducted following a request from the Minister for Finance on 18 July 2023, under section 40 of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013. The audit is conducted under section 15 of the Auditor-General Act 1997.
AGD has been included in the annual performance statements audit program since the commencement of the pilot in 2019–20. There are no significant or moderate findings carried over from the prior year.
AGD’s performance statements are non-complex with a maturing performance reporting framework and the engagement risk has been assessed as low.
The key risks for AGD’s performance statements that the ANAO has highlighted include:
- the appropriateness of AGD’s performance measures and targets, particularly whether the suite of performance measures outlined in the Corporate Plan and Portfolio Budget Statements provide meaningful information on the department’s performance in achieving its purposes; and
- the completeness of performance measures and targets across all key functions for which AGD has responsibility.
Financial statements audits
Overview
Entities within the Attorney-General’s portfolio, and the risk profile of each entity, are shown in Table 1.
|
Type of entity |
Engagement risk |
Number of higher risks |
Number of moderate risks |
Material entities |
||||
Attorney-General’s Department |
Non-corporate |
Moderate |
0 |
2 |
Australian Federal Police |
Non-corporate |
Moderate |
1 |
0 |
High Court of Australia |
- |
Low |
0 |
1 |
Non-material entities |
||||
Administrative Appeals Tribunal |
Non-corporate |
Moderate |
|
|
Australian Crime Commission (Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission) |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Australian Financial Security Authority |
Non-corporate |
Moderate |
|
|
Australian Human Rights Commission |
Corporate |
Low |
|
|
Australian Institute of Criminology |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Australian Law Reform Commission |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Federal Court of Australia |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
National Anti-Corruption Commission |
Non-corporate |
Moderate |
|
|
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Office of Parliamentary Counsel |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Office of the Special Investigator |
Non-corporate |
Low |
|
|
Other audit engagements (including Auditor-General Act 1997 section 20 engagements) |
||||
Australian Financial Security Authority – Bankruptcy Act |
||||
ACT Community Policing statement of financial performance |
||||
ACT Community Policing statement of performance |
||||
Note a: Sourced from Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (Flipchart of PGPA Act) Commonwealth entities and companies (Department of Finance) as at 1 March 2024.
Material entities
Attorney-General’s Department
The Attorney-General’s Department (AGD) supports the Attorney-General through the provision of expert advice and services on a range of law, justice, integrity and national security issues.
AGD’s total budgeted revenues for 2024–25 are $538.4 million, with sales of goods and services representing 37 per cent, as shown in Figure 4. Grants expense represent 40 per cent of total budgeted expenses.
Source: ANAO analysis of 2024–25 Portfolio Budget Statements.
There are two key risks for the AGD’s 2023–24 financial statements that the ANAO has highlighted for specific audit coverage.
- The completeness and accuracy of revenue and related balances from rendering of legal services, which is material to AGD’s financial statements and subject to judgements on revenue recognition.
- The management of AGD’s grant programs due to complexity arising from differing legislative and policy requirements.
Australian Federal Police
The Australian Federal Police is responsible for the provision of police services in relation to laws of the Commonwealth, the provision of policing services to the Australian Capital Territory and external territories, combatting transnational serious organised crime and terrorism, disrupting crime offshore, supporting regional security, and protecting Australian interests and assets.
The Australian Federal Police’s total budgeted expenses for 2024–25 are $2.0 billion, with 55 per cent of these expenses attributable to employee benefits, as shown in Figure 5.
Source: ANAO analysis of 14 May 2024–25 Portfolio Budget Statements.
The key risk for the Australian Federal Police’s 2023–24 financial statements that the ANAO has highlighted for specific audit coverage is the recognition and measurement of payroll expenses including underpayment of superannuation obligations.
High Court of Australia
The High Court of Australia is responsible for interpreting and applying the law of Australia; deciding on cases of special federal significance, including challenges to the constitutional validity of laws; and hearing appeals, by special leave, from federal, state and territory courts.
The High Court of Australia’s total budgeted assets for 2024–25 are $251.3 million, with 88 per cent of these assets attributable to land and buildings, as shown in Figure 6.
Source: ANAO analysis of 2024–25 Portfolio Budget Statements.
The key risk for the High Court’s 2023–24 financial statements is the valuation of land and buildings, as these are special-purpose assets with numerous unique features.